Return to WorkInjury.com Home    

 
                        - Help for the Injured Worker
                                - Resources for the WC Professional

< Return to WorkInjury.com Home >



Advanced Search

GO TO:                    

2005 Archives

  • Archived Cases

  • Archived Editorials

  • Office Technology


  • Opinion: Good Riddance to Lawyers and "Labor Fat-Cats"

     

    May 2, 2005
    Source: San Francisco Chronicle
    --------------------------------

    And just when even a high-powered defense attorney makes huge waves around the state complaining about the unfairness of the payments now made to truly injured workers under the new system (see these 2 articles from WorkInjury.com, article 1 and article 2), we now have a political commentator, in a major news publication, telling us what a raving success the new laws are. Who do we believe?

    Jill Stewart writes in the San Francisco Chronicle that SB 899 "is a big success. Rates are plunging, insurance companies who fled corrupt California are back and severely injured workers receive more money while the barely injured get less. How incredibly sensible."

    She points to the fact that one-quarter of the private investigators she's recently heard from had been making their money investigating workers' comp. fraud and that the new laws are fixing all that by ridding us of the "tens of thousands of cheaters, greedy doctors and greedy lawyers (who bled) the system dry."

    Which begs the question: Were the seriously injured workers who testified at last week's Senate hearing about their drop in benefits lying? Or just frauds?

    This is an amazing commentary that shows, when it comes to workers' comp. reform, just how far apart opposing views really are... and how difficult future compromise may be.

    [Although we can't help but wonder whether Ms. Stewart's description of severely injured workers as "the big winners" would remain the same if she were seriously injured at work and had to rely on the new benefits -- though we're guessing, as an independent contractor, she's got much better private coverage.]

    To read the full copyrighted story from the news source credited at the top of this article, please click here.*

     

    [-pg]      

     

    ------------ © 2005 WorkInjury, Inc. ------------

    Return to Top of Page

    _________________________________________________
    * Some of the news links that WorkInjury.com provides to other articles may require that you "register" with them. All are free and usually ask for nothing more than an email address and name. Once registered, you are then linked to the article you originally called up (and only need register once). WorkInjury.com has no affiliation with the sites linked and has nothing to do with their registration process, which is completely voluntary.

    Send Us Articles

    GO TO:                        

  • All FORUMS

  • Commentary
  • Yellow Pages



  • Goldberger & Associates

    HMS

    Contact Us | About WorkInjury.com | Legal
    (c) 2005 WorkInjury, Inc.       All rights reserved.       Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Accessibility